{rfName}
A

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Grant support

This work has been partially supported by the EC's Seventh Framework Programme via the Energy Efficiency and Risk Management in Public Buildings (EnRiMa) project (number 260041). We acknowledge EnRiMa project partners for their collaboration during the project (http://www.enrima-project.eu/project/partners). Moreover, IIASA's Young Scientists Summer Program (YSSP) hosted the correspondence author in 2013 to develop some aspects of the work presented in this paper (special thanks to Yurii Yermoliev and Tatiana Ermolieva). Finally, we acknowledge national projects OPTIMOS 3 (MTM2012-36163-006-06), Content & Intelligence (IPT-2012-0912-430000), PPI (RTC-2015-3580-7), and UNIKO (RTC-2015-3521-7).

Analysis of institutional authors

Cano, ElCorresponding AuthorMoguerza, JmAuthorAlonso-Ayuso, AAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

A multi-stage stochastic optimization model for energy systems planning and risk management

Publicated to:Energy And Buildings. 110 49-56 - 2016-01-01 110(), DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.10.020

Authors: Cano, Emilio L; Moguerza, Javier M; Alonso-Ayuso, Antonio

Affiliations

Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Stat, Madrid 28933, Spain - Author

Abstract

Strategic decision making at the building level is gaining importance in the context of a more and more deregulated energy market. The increase of the set of available options regarding distributed and renewable energy technologies leads to a complex decision process. Importantly, such decision making process is affected by uncertainties and therefore stochastic models are needed. In this paper, a comprehensive deterministic strategic optimization model for energy systems planning at the building level is extended to a stochastic optimization framework, thereby allowing the decision maker to manage risks in addition to considering the variability of the uncertain parameters. A numerical example shows the importance of taking into account uncertainty and risk in this kind of problems. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Artificial intelligenceBuilding strategic planningDecision makingDecision making processDecision support systemsDeregulated energy marketDeregulationDominanceEfficiencyEnergy balanceEnergy efficiencyEnergy efficiency in buildingsEnergy managementEnergy management systemsEnergy systemsEnergy systems planningOptimizationRenewable energy resourcesRenewable energy technologiesRisk managementStochastic modelsStochastic optimization modelStochastic optimizationsStochastic systemsStrategic decision makingUncertainty analysis

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Energy And Buildings due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2016, it was in position 3/125, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Engineering, Civil.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2025-06-15:

  • WoS: 32
  • Scopus: 35
  • OpenCitations: 28

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-15:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 96 (PlumX).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (López Cano, Emilio) and Last Author (Alonso Ayuso, Antonio).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been López Cano, Emilio.