{rfName}
Se

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Grant support

This work was supported in part by the KLINILYCS under Grant TEC2016-75361-R, in part by the AAVis-BMR under Grant PID2019-107768RA-I00, in part by the BigTheory under Grant PID2019-106623RB-C41, in part by the meHeart RisBi under Grant PID2019-104356RB-C42, in part by the miHeart-DaBa through the Agencia Estatal de Investigacion and co-funded by FEDER under Grant PID2019-104356RB-C43, in part by the Young Researchers Research and Development Project through the Community of Madrid and Rey Juan Carlos University under Project 2020-656, in part by the KERMES under Grant TEC2016-81900-REDT, and in part by the MAPAS through the Spanish Government under Grant TIN2017-90567-REDT.

Analysis of institutional authors

Rodriguez-Ibanez, MAuthorSoguero-Ruiz, CAuthorRojo-Alvarez, JlCorresponding Author

Share

Publications
>
Article

Sentiment Analysis of Political Tweets From the 2019 Spanish Elections

Publicated to:Ieee Access. 9 101847-101862 - 2021-01-01 9(), DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097492

Authors: Rodriguez-Ibanez, Margarita; Gimeno-Blanes, Francisco-Javier; Cuenca-Jimenez, Pedro Manuel; Soguero-Ruiz, Cristina; Rojo-Alvarez, Jose Luis

Affiliations

Univ Miguel Hernandez, Dept Commun Engn, Alicante 03202, Spain - Author
Univ Politecn Madrid, Ctr Computat Simulat, Madrid 28040, Spain - Author
Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Dept Business, Madrid 28933, Spain - Author
Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Dept Signal Theory & Commun Telemat & Comp Syst, Madrid 28933, Spain - Author

Abstract

The use of sentiment analysis methods has increased in recent years across a wide range of disciplines. Despite the potential impact of the development of opinions during political elections, few studies have focused on the analysis of sentiment dynamics and their characterization from statistical and mathematical perspectives. In this paper, we apply a set of basic methods to analyze the statistical and temporal dynamics of sentiment analysis on political campaigns and assess their scope and limitations. To this end, we gathered thousands of Twitter messages mentioning political parties and their leaders posted several weeks before and after the 2019 Spanish presidential election. We then followed a twofold analysis strategy: (1) statistical characterization using indices derived from well-known temporal and information metrics and methods -including entropy, mutual information, and the Compounded Aggregated Positivity Index- allowing the estimation of changes in the density function of sentiment data; and (2) feature extraction from nonlinear intrinsic patterns in terms of manifold learning using autoencoders and stochastic embeddings. The results show that both the indices and the manifold features provide an informative characterization of the sentiment dynamics throughout the election period. We found measurable variations in sentiment behavior and polarity across the political parties and their leaders and observed different dynamics depending on the parties' positions on the political spectrum, their presence at the regional or national levels, and their nationalist or globalist aspirations.

Keywords

Analysis strategiesAnalytical modelsAutoencondersBlogsCollected tweetsDictionariesDynamicsElection candidatesElection resultsInformation metricsLearning systemsLexiconMachine learningManifold embeddingManifold learningMutual informationsPolitical campaignPoliticsPotential impactsPresidential electionSentiment analysisSocial networking (online)Social networking sitesStatistical characterizationStochastic systemsText analysisTwitterVoting

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Ieee Access due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2021, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Engineering (Miscellaneous).

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 1.09. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 1.36 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-17, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 15
  • Scopus: 20
  • OpenCitations: 17

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-17:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 120 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Rodríguez Ibáñez, Margarita Carmen) and Last Author (Rojo Álvarez, José Luis).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been Rojo Álvarez, José Luis.