{rfName}
Be

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Borromeo, SusanaAuthorRodriguez-Sanchez, CristinaAuthorDel-Ama, Antonio JAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

Benchmarking the Effects on Human-Exoskeleton Interaction of Trajectory, Admittance and EMG-Triggered Exoskeleton Movement Control

Publicated to:Sensors. 23 (2): 791- - 2023-01-01 23(2), DOI: 10.3390/s23020791

Authors: Rodrigues-Carvalho, Camila; Fernandez-Garcia, Marvin; Pinto-Fernandez, David; Sanz-Morere, Clara; Barroso, Filipe Oliveira; Borromeo, Susana; Rodriguez-Sanchez, Cristina; Moreno, Juan C; del-Ama, Antonio J

Affiliations

Carlos III Univ Madrid, Syst Engn & Automat Dept, Madrid 28903, Spain - Author
CSIC, Cajal Inst, Neural Rehabil Grp, Madrid 28002, Spain - Author
Hosp Los Madronos, Ctr Clin Neurosci, Madrid 28690, Spain - Author
Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Elect Technol Dept, Mostoles 28933, Spain - Author
Univ Politecn Madrid, CAR UPM Associated Unit, Madrid 28040, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Nowadays, robotic technology for gait training is becoming a common tool in rehabilitation hospitals. However, its effectiveness is still controversial. Traditional control strategies do not adequately integrate human intention and interaction and little is known regarding the impact of exoskeleton control strategies on muscle coordination, physical effort, and user acceptance. In this article, we benchmarked three types of exoskeleton control strategies in a sample of seven healthy volunteers: trajectory assistance (TC), compliant assistance (AC), and compliant assistance with EMG-Onset stepping control (OC), which allows the user to decide when to take a step during the walking cycle. This exploratory study was conducted within the EUROBENCH project facility. Experimental procedures and data analysis were conducted following EUROBENCH's protocols. Specifically, exoskeleton kinematics, muscle activation, heart and breathing rates, skin conductance, as well as user-perceived effort were analyzed. Our results show that the OC controller showed robust performance in detecting stepping intention even using a corrupt EMG acquisition channel. The AC and OC controllers resulted in similar kinematic alterations compared to the TC controller. Muscle synergies remained similar to the synergies found in the literature, although some changes in muscle contribution were found, as well as an overall increase in agonist-antagonist co-contraction. The OC condition led to the decreased mean duration of activation of synergies. These differences were not reflected in the overall physiological impact of walking or subjective perception. We conclude that, although the AC and OC walking conditions allowed the users to modulate their walking pattern, the application of these two controllers did not translate into significant changes in the overall physiological cost of walking nor the perceived experience of use. Nonetheless, results suggest that both AC and OC controllers are potentially interesting approaches that can be explored as gait rehabilitation tools. Furthermore, the INTENTION project is, to our knowledge, the first study to benchmark the effects on human-exoskeleton interaction of three different exoskeleton controllers, including a new EMG-based controller designed by us and never tested in previous studies, which has made it possible to provide valuable third-party feedback on the use of the EUROBENCH facility and testbed, enriching the apprenticeship of the project consortium and contributing to the scientific community.

Keywords

BenchmarkingBiomechanical phenomenaChemical activationConditionControl strategiesControllersElectromyographyEmg controlExoskeletonExoskeleton (robotics)Exoskeleton controlExoskeleton deviceGaitGait trainingHuman robot interactionHuman-robot interactionHumansHumans-robot interactionsHuman–robot interactionKinematicsMovement controlMuscleMuscle, skeletalMuscle-activityNeurorehabilitationOnsetReductionRehabilitation hospitalsRobotRobotic technologiesRobustWalkingWalking aids

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Sensors due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2023, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Instrumentation.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 1.09. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 1.18 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 5.87 (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-16, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 6
  • Scopus: 9
  • Europe PMC: 3
  • OpenCitations: 8

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-16:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 42 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

    It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

    • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

    Leadership analysis of institutional authors

    There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (Ama Espinosa, Antonio José del).