{rfName}
In

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Grant support

This research was partially funded by CDTI (Spanish acronym: Centre for Industrial Technological Development), funding number COI-20201153. Partially supported by the Google Cloud Research Credits program with the funding number GCP19980904, by the project RTI2018-099118-A-I00 founded by MCIU/AEI/FEDER UE and by the European Commission-NextGenerationEU, through CSIC's Global Health Platform (PTI Salud Global).

Analysis of institutional authors

Henriquez-Camacho, CesarAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Article

Inter-Rater Variability in the Evaluation of Lung Ultrasound in Videos Acquired from COVID-19 Patients

Publicated to:Applied Sciences-Basel. 13 (3): - 2023-02-01 13(3), DOI: 10.3390/app13031321

Authors: Herraiz, JL; Freijo, C; Camacho, J; Muñoz, M; González, R; Alonso-Roca, R; Alvarez-Troncoso, J; Beltrán-Romero, LM; Bernabeu-Wittel, M; Blancas, R; Calvo-Cebrián, A; Campo-Linares, R; Chehayeb-Morán, J; Chorda-Ribelles, J; García-Rubio, S; García-de-Casasola, G; Gil-Rodrigo, A; Henríquez-Camacho, C; Hernandez-Píriz, A; Hernandez-Quiles, C; Llamas-Fuentes, R; Luordo, D; Marín-Baselga, R; Martínez-Díaz, MC; Mateos-González, M; Mendez-Bailon, M; Miralles-Aguiar, F; Nogue, R; Nogué, M; de Urbina-Antia, BO; Oviedo-García, AA; Porcel, JM; Rodriguez, S; Rodríguez-Serrano, DA; Sainz, T; Sánchez-Barrancos, IM; Torres-Arrese, M; Torres-Macho, J; Vicente, AT; Villén-Villegas, T; Zafra-Sánchez, JJ; Tung-Chen, Y

Affiliations

CSIC, Inst Phys & Informat Technol ITEFI, Grp Ultrasound Syst & Technol, Madrid 28040, Spain - Author
Ctr Salud Mar Balt, Madrid 28040, Spain - Author
Ctr Salud Pio XII Ciudad Real I, Ciudad Real 13002, Spain - Author
Ctr Salud Robledo Chavela, Robledo De Chavela 28294, Spain - Author
Dasel SL, Madrid 28500, Spain - Author
Dr Balmis Gen Univ Hosp, Alicante Inst Hlth & Biomed Res ISABIAL, Emergency Dept, Alicante 03010, Spain - Author
Hosp Arnau Vilanova, Internal Med Dept, Lleida 25198, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin San Carlos, Hlth Res Inst IdISSC, Madrid 28040, Spain - Author
Hosp Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal, Internal Med Dept, Madrid 28055, Spain - Author
Hosp Fdn Alcorcon, Emergency Dept, Madrid 28922, Spain - Author
Hosp Infanta Cristina, Internal Med Dept, Parla 28981, Spain - Author
Hosp Reina Sofia, Emergency Dept, Cordoba 14004, Spain - Author
Hosp San Eloy, Emergency Dept, Baracaldo 48902, Spain - Author
Hosp Santa Barbara, Emergency Dept, Puertollano 13500, Spain - Author
Hosp Santa Marina, Internal Med Dept, Bilbao 48004, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Clin San Carlos, Internal Med Dept, Madrid 28040, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Clin Valladolid, Emergency Dept, Valladolid 47003, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Cruces, Pneumol Dept, Baracaldo 48903, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Gen Valencia, Internal Med Dept, Valencia 46014, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Infanta Leonor Virgen Torre, Internal Med Dept, Madrid 28031, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ La Paz, Gen Pediat & Infect & Trop Dis Dept, Madrid 28046, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ La Paz, Internal Med Dept, Madrid 28046, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Paz IdiPAZ, Inst Invest, Madrid 28046, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Principe Asturias, Intens Care Med Dept, Alcala De Henares 28805, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Puerta Mar, Anesthesiol Dept, Cadiz 11009, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Internal Med Dept, Mostoles 28933, Spain - Author
Hosp Valme, Emergency Dept, Seville 41014, Spain - Author
Hosp Virgen Rocio, Internal Med Dept, Seville 41013, Spain - Author
Inst Salud Carlos 3, Area Enfermedades Infec Ctr Invest Biomed Red Ins, Madrid 28029, Spain - Author
Univ Alfonso X El Sabio, Dept Med, Madrid 28055, Spain - Author
Univ Alfonso X El Sabio, Hosp Univ Tajo, Dept Med, Intens Care Unit, Aranjuez 28300, Spain - Author
Univ Complutense Madrid, Nucl Phys Grp, EMFTEL & IPARCOS, Madrid 28040, Spain - Author
Univ Francisco Vitoria, Dept Med, Madrid 28223, Spain - Author
Univ Lleida, Dept Med, Lleida 25008, Spain - Author
Univ Seville, Dept Med, Seville 41009, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Lung ultrasound (LUS) allows for the detection of a series of manifestations of COVID-19, such as B-lines and consolidations. The objective of this work was to study the inter-rater reliability (IRR) when detecting signs associated with COVID-19 in the LUS, as well as the performance of the test in a longitudinal or transverse orientation. Thirty-three physicians with advanced experience in LUS independently evaluated ultrasound videos previously acquired using the ULTRACOV system on 20 patients with confirmed COVID-19. For each patient, 24 videos of 3 s were acquired (using 12 positions with the probe in longitudinal and transverse orientations). The physicians had no information about the patients or other previous evaluations. The score assigned to each acquisition followed the convention applied in previous studies. A substantial IRR was found in the cases of normal LUS (kappa = 0.74), with only a fair IRR for the presence of individual B-lines (kappa = 0.36) and for confluent B-lines occupying < 50% (kappa = 0.26) and a moderate IRR in consolidations and B-lines > 50% (kappa = 0.50). No statistically significant differences between the longitudinal and transverse scans were found. The IRR for LUS of COVID-19 patients may benefit from more standardized clinical protocols.

Keywords
Computed-tomographyCoronavirus disease 2019Inter-observer agreementInter-rater reliabilityLung ultrasoundPoint-of-care ultrasoundReliabilitySevere acute respiratory syndromeUltrasound

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Applied Sciences-Basel due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2023, it was in position 44/181, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Engineering, Multidisciplinary.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 1.77, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 12.33 (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-16, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 2
  • Scopus: 11
  • OpenCitations: 10
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-16:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 21.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 21 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 16.2.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 28 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.