Indexado en

Licencia y uso

Citaciones

Cited 23 times in

Cited 20 times in

Cited 5 times in

Altmetrics

Grant support

A.E. was supported by REMEDINAL TE-CM (S2018/EMT-4338). L.C. and M.J.M. were supported through two grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CGL2013-45634-P, CGL2016-75414-P). M.A.Z. was supported by grant RTI2018-096884-B-C32 (MICINN, Spain). C.A. was supported by the Victorian DELWP iFER (Integrated Forest Ecosystem Research) programme. A.H. was supported by the University of Alcala (Own Research Programme 2019 Postdoctoral Grant) and Basque Country Government funding support to FisioClimaCO2 (IT1022-16) research group. We thank the MITECO and MAPA (Spain) for granting access to the Spanish Forest Inventory Data.

Análisis de autorías institucional

Compartir

Climate reverses directionality in the richness-abundance relationship across the World's main forest biomes

Publicado en:Nature Communications. 11 (1): 5635- - 2020-11-06 11(1), DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19460-y

Autores: Madrigal-Gonzalez, Jaime; Calatayud, Joaquin; Ballesteros-Canovas, Juan A; Escudero, Adrian; Cayuela, Luis; Rueda, Marta; Ruiz-Benito, Paloma; Herrero, Asier; Aponte, Cristina; Sagardia, Rodrigo; Plumptre, Andrew J; Dupire, Sylvain; Espinosa, Carlos, I; Tutubalina, Olga; Myint, Moe; Pataro, Luciano; Lopez-Saez, Jerome; Macia, Manuel J; Abegg, Meinrad; Zavala, Miguel A; Quesada-Roman, Adolfo; Vega-Araya, Mauricio; Golubeva, Elena; Timokhina, Yuliya; Stoffel, Markus

Afiliaciones

Resumen

More tree species can increase the carbon storage capacity of forests (here referred to as the more species hypothesis) through increased tree productivity and tree abundance resulting from complementarity, but they can also be the consequence of increased tree abundance through increased available energy (more individuals hypothesis). To test these two contrasting hypotheses, we analyse the most plausible pathways in the richness-abundance relationship and its stability along global climatic gradients. We show that positive effect of species richness on tree abundance only prevails in eight of the twenty-three forest regions considered in this study. In the other forest regions, any benefit from having more species is just as likely (9 regions) or even less likely (6 regions) than the effects of having more individuals. We demonstrate that diversity effects prevail in the most productive environments, and abundance effects become dominant towards the most limiting conditions. These findings can contribute to refining cost-effective mitigation strategies based on fostering carbon storage through increased tree diversity. Specifically, in less productive environments, mitigation measures should promote abundance of locally adapted and stress tolerant tree species instead of increasing species richness. Correlations between tree species diversity and tree abundance are well established, but the direction of the relationship is unresolved. Here the authors use path models to estimate plausible causal pathways in the diversity-abundance relationship across 23 global forests regions, finding a lack of general support for a positive diversity-abundance relationship, which is prevalent in the most productive lands on Earth only

Palabras clave