{rfName}
Fa

License and use

Altmetrics

Grant support

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [PSI2015-65152-C2-1-R] and the Ministry of Science and Innovation [PID2019-106714RB-C21]. Maria del Sequeros Pedroso-Chaparro was supported by a Pre-Doctoral Grant from the Universidad Autonoma de Madrid. Lucia Jimenez-Gonzalo and Jose Adrian Fernandes-Pires were supported by a Pre-Doctoral Grant from the Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Cristina Huertas-Domingo was supported by an FPI grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science, and Samara BarreraCaballero was supported by an FPU [grant FPU17/02548] from the Spanish Ministry of Education.

Analysis of institutional authors

Losada-Baltar, ACorresponding AuthorVara-Garcia, CAuthorJimenez-Gonzalo, LAuthorFernandes-Pires, JAuthorHuertas-Domingo, CAuthorBarrera-Caballero, SAuthorRomero-Moreno, RAuthor

Share

September 27, 2022
Publications
>
Article
No

Family caregivers of people with dementia in the context of the sociocultural stress and coping model: An examination of gender differences

Publicated to:Journal Of Women & Aging. 35 (4): 354-368 - 2023-07-04 35(4), DOI: 10.1080/08952841.2022.2052705

Authors: Losada-Baltar, Andres; Vara-Garcia, Carlos; Del Sequeros Pedroso-Chaparro, Maria; Cabrera, Isabel; Jimenez-Gonzalo, Lucia; Fernandes-Pires, Jose; Huertas-Domingo, Cristina; Barrera-Caballero, Samara; Gallego-Alberto, Laura; Romero-Moreno, Rosa; Marquez-Gonzalez, Maria

Affiliations

Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Psicol, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Fac Ciencias Salud, Madrid, Spain - Author

Abstract

The study assessed gender differences in the associations between familism dimensions, dysfunctional thoughts, and resource and outcome variables in 190 Spanish dementia family caregivers. A theoretical model was tested through path analysis, obtaining an excellent fit of the model to the data. Higher scores in the familial obligations dimension were associated with lower self-efficacy for self-care and obtaining respite and leisure frequency, and higher anxious and depressive feelings, in female caregivers only. Significant between-gender differences were obtained, suggesting that female caregivers holding strong familistic values are more vulnerable to the negative consequences of caregiving compared to male caregivers.

Keywords

Adaptation, psychologicalAnxietyCaregiversDementiaDepressive symptomsDistressFamilismFemaleHealthHumansLeisureMalePredictorsPrevalenceReliabilityRevised scaleSatisfactionSelf-efficacySelf-efficacy SexSex factorsSpanishStress, psychological

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Journal Of Women & Aging due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2023, it was in position 21/66, thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Womens Studies. Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q2 para la agencia Scopus (SJR) en la categoría Gender Studies.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 2.65. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 1.27 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 4.75 (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-16, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 8
  • Scopus: 7
  • Europe PMC: 3

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-16:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 24.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 28 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 7.5.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Losada Baltar, Andrés) .

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been Losada Baltar, Andrés.