{rfName}
A

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Citations

1

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Miguel Pérez EsCorresponding Author

Share

October 10, 2022
Publications
>
Review
Sí

A constitutional agreement? The pact of san sebastian as grounds for the 1931 republican autonomous institutional structure for governance according to testimony sources [¿un acueRdo constitucional? El pacto de san sebastián como fundamento de la institucionalidad autonómica republicana de 1931 según las fuentes testimoniales]

Publicated to:Revista De Estudios Historico-Juridicos. (43): 187-199 - 2021-01-01 (43), DOI: 10.4067/S0716-54552021000100187

Authors: Miguel Pérez ES

Affiliations

Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Paseo de los Artilleros S/N., Madrid, 28032, Spain - Author

Abstract

On 17 August 1930, the political actors advocating for the establishment of the Second Spanish Republic, including both the republican parties as well as the formal monarchical leaders, gathered at San Sebastian to establish a strategic pact to facilitate the transition from the monarchy to the republic. The delegates of the Catalan actors to the Pact, however, requested that there was explicit mention that the signatories to the Pact were thereby recognizing a self-government political regime for Catalonia, which meant undertaking a constituent commitment that subsequently took the form of the Spanish Constitution of 1931. © 2021 Ediciones Universitarias de Valparaiso. All rights reserved.

Keywords

AutonomyCataloniaConstitutionPact of san sebastianSecond republicSpain

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Revista De Estudios Historico-Juridicos due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2021, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category History.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2025-07-08:

  • Scopus: 1

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-08:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 1 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (San Miguel Pérez, Enrique) and Last Author (San Miguel Pérez, Enrique).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been San Miguel Pérez, Enrique.