{rfName}
TA

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

8

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Guede JrsAuthorAntonovica AAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Article

TAM VERSUS UTAUT MODELS: A CONTRASTING STUDY OF SCHOLARLY PRODUCTION AND ITS BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS [LOS MODELOS TAM FRENTE A LOS UTAUT: ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO DE LA PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y ANÁLISIS BIBIOMÉTRICO]

Publicated to:Techno Review. International Technology, Science And Society Review / Revista Internacional De Tecnologã­a, Ciencia Y Sociedad. 11 - 2022-01-01 11(), DOI: 10.37467/revtechno.v11.4445

Authors: Sebastián MGB; Guede JRS; Antonovica A

Affiliations

Rey Juan Carlos University, Spain - Author

Abstract

The objective of this research is to review and compare the TAM/TAM2/TAM3 and the UTAUT/UTAUT2 through a bibliometric approach to determine which is the most appropriate model to study new technologies. Data was obtained from the Web of Science database. 2,450 publications were examined, related to TAM/TAM2/ TAM3 and 5,145 publications of UTAUT/UTAUT2 during the period 2016-2021. The findings confirm that UTAUT/UTAUT2 is being used by more and more researchers. This review offers a holistic view that will help future researchers to select the most appropriate models in their disciplines of study. © GKA Ediciones, authors. Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada.

Keywords
BibliometricsModels and frameworks in technology adoptionTamUtaut 2Visualization mapVosviewerWeb of science (wos)

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Techno Review. International Technology, Science And Society Review / Revista Internacional De Tecnologã­a, Ciencia Y Sociedad, Q4 Agency Scopus (SJR), its regional focus and specialization in Computer Science Applications, give it significant recognition in a specific niche of scientific knowledge at an international level.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 1.63, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-04-30, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 8
  • OpenCitations: 4
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-04-30:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 42 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author () and Last Author (Antonovica, Arta).